This is "The No You Cants-You Better Nots" page.
Terms & Conditions of Use.
Be advised: This web site records information about all visitors. No personal information is gathered. However, statistical data is garnered from visitors of these pages in an effort to deter "Copyright" infringement and/or the taking or use of "Copyrighted" intellectual information/data/stories/ideas from this site without the expressed written permission of the author/s/creator/owner of this web site is prohibited.
www.TheRoyalBavarians.com, hereafter (“www.TheRoyalBavarians.com”), maintains this site (the “Site”) for your personal entertainment, information, education, and communication. Please feel free to browse the Site. You may download material displayed on the Site for non-commercial, personal use only, provided you also retain all copyright and other proprietary notices contained on the materials, and/or agree to all conditions herein set forth. You may not, however, distribute, modify, transmit, reuse, report, or use the contents of the Site for public or commercial purposes, including the text, images, audio, and video without www.TheRoyalBavarians.com/Owner/Authorized Agent written permission.
Your access and use of the Site is also subject to the following terms and conditions ("Terms and Conditions”) and all applicable laws. By accessing and browsing the Site, you accept, without limitation or qualification, the Terms and Conditions and agree.
Terms and Conditions
You should assume that everything you see or read on the Site is copyrighted unless otherwise noted and may not be used except as provided in these Terms and Conditions or in the text on the Site without the written permission of www.TheRoyalBavarians.com neither warrants nor represents that your use of materials displayed on the Site will not infringe rights of third parties not owned by or affiliated with www.TheRoyalBavarians.com.
While www.TheRoyalBavarians.com uses reasonable efforts to include accurate and up-to-date information on the Site, www.TheRoyalBavarians.com makes no warranties or representations as to its accuracy. Www.TheRoyalBavarians.com assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the content on the Site and/or content input supplied by third parties, i.e. "The Discussion Forum".
Your use and browsing of the Site is at your risk. Neither www.TheRoyalBavarians.com nor any other party involved in creating, producing, or delivering the Site is liable for any direct, incidental, consequential, indirect, or punitive damages arising out of your access to, or use of, the Site. Without limiting the foregoing, everything on the Site is provided to you “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. Please note that some jurisdictions may not allow the exclusion of implied warranties, so some of the above exclusions may not apply to you. Check your local laws for any restrictions or limitations regarding the exclusion of implied warranties. Www.TheRoyalBavarians.com also assumes no responsibility, and shall not be liable for any damages to, or viruses that may infect, your computer equipment or other property on account of your access to, use of, or browsing in the Site or your downloading of any materials, data, text, images, video, or audio from the Site.
Any communication or material you transmit to the Site by electronic mail or otherwise, including any data, questions, comments, suggestions, or the like is, and will be treated as, non-confidential and non-proprietary. Anything you transmit or post may be used by www.TheRoyalBavarians.com or its affiliates for any purpose, including but not limited to reproduction, disclosure, transmission, publication, broadcast, and posting. Furthermore, www.TheRoyalBavarians.com is free to use any ideas, concepts, know-how, or techniques contained in any communication you send to the Site for any purpose whatsoever, including but not limited to developing, manufacturing and marketing products using such information.
Images displayed on the Site are either the property of, or used with permission by, www.TheRoyalBavarians.com. The use of these images by you, or anyone else authorized by you, is prohibited unless specifically permitted by these Terms and Conditions or specific permission provided elsewhere on the Site. Any unauthorized communications regulations and statutes. Www.TheRoyalBavarians.com has not reviewed all of the sites linked to the Site and is not responsible for the contents of any off-site pages or any other sites linked to the Site. Your linking to any other off-site pages or other sites is at your own risk.
Although www.TheRoyalBavarians.com may from time to time monitor or review discussions, chats, postings, transmissions, bulletin boards, and the like on the Site, www.TheRoyalBavarians.com is under no obligation to do so and assumes no responsibility or liability arising from the content of any such locations nor for any error, defamation, libel, slander, omission, falsehood, obscenity, pornography, profanity, danger, or inaccuracy contained in any information contained within such locations on the Site. You are prohibited from posting pornographic, or profane materials or any material that could constitute or encourage conduct that would be considered a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or otherwise violate any law. Www.TheRoyalBavarians.com will fully cooperate with any law enforcement authorities or court order requesting or directing www.TheRoyalBavarians.com to disclose the identity of anyone posting any such information or materials.
Www.TheRoyalBavarians.com may at any time revise these Terms and Conditions by updating this posting. You are bound by any such revisions and should therefore periodically visit this page to review the current Terms and Conditions to which you are bound.
Www.TheRoyalBavarians.com encourages links to our pages. However, we do ask that you notify our Webmaster when you link to our pages so that we may keep you informed of changes. If you have any questions regarding use of www.TheRoyalBavarians.com, logos or graphics please contact our Webmaster. All graphics and content on the www.TheRoyalBavarians.com site are "Copyright" © and All Rights are Reserved from inception and into perpetuity or until such time and date as All Rights are Relinquished by legal contract and/or in Writing by the owner/s /authors/creators.
10 Myths About Copyright Law
By Brad Templeton
“If it doesn’t have a copyright notice, it’s not copyrighted.”
This was true in the past, but today almost all major nations follow the Berne copyright convention. For example, in the USA, almost everything created privately after April 1, 1989 is copyrighted and protected whether it has a notice or not. The default you should assume for other people’s works is that they are copyrighted and may not be coped unless you *know* otherwise. There are some old works that lost protection without notice, but frankly you should not risk it unless you know for sure.
It is true that a notice strengthens the protection, by warning people, and by allowing one to get more and different damages, but it is not necessary. If it looks copyrighted, you should assume it is. This applies to pictures, too. You may not scan pictures from magazines and post them to the net, and if you come upon something unknown, you shouldn’t post that either.
The correct form for a notice is “ Copyright (dates) by (author/owner)” You can use C in a circle instead of “Copyright” but “©” has never been given legal force. The phrase “All Rights Reserved” used to be required in some nations but is now not needed.
“If I don’t charge for it, it’s not a violation.”
False. Whether you charge can affect the damages awarded in court, but that’s essentially the only difference. It’s still a violation if you give it away--and there can still be heavy damages if you hurt the commercial value of the property.
“If it’s posted to Usenet it’s in the public domain.”
False. Nothing is in the public domain anymore unless the owner explicitly puts it in the public domain(*). Explicitly, as in you have a note from the author/owner saying, “I grant this to the public domain.” those exact words or words very much like them.
Some argue that posting to Usenet implicitly grants permission to everybody to copy the posting within fairly wide bounds, and other feel that Usenet is an automatic store and forward network where all the thousands of copies made are done at the command (rather than the consent) of the poster. This is a matter of some debate, but even if the former is true (and in this writer’s opinion we should all pray it isn’t true) it simply would suggest posters are implicitly granting permissions “for the sort of copy one might expect when one posts to Usenet” and in no case is this a placement of material into the public domain. Furthermore it is very difficult for an implicit licence to supersede an explicitly stated licence that the copier was aware of.
Note that all this assumes the poster had the right to post the item in the first place. If the poster didn’t, then all the copies are pirate, and no implied licence or theoretical reduction of the copyright can take place.
(*) Copyrights can expire after a long time, putting something into the public domain, and there are some fine points on this issue regarding older copyright law versions. However, none of this applies to an original article posted to USENET.
Note that granting something to the public domain is a complete abandonment of all rights. You can’t make something “PD for non-commercial use.” If your work is PD, other people can even modify one byte and put their name on it.
“My posting was just fair use!”
Fair use is almost always a short excerpt and almost always attributed. (One should not use more of the work than is necessary to make the commentary.) it should not harm the commercial value of the work (which is another reason why reproduction of the entire work is generally forbidden.)
Note that most inclusion of text in Usenet follow-ups is for commentary and reply, and it doesn’t damage the commercial value of the original posting (if it has any) and as such it is fair use. Fair use isn’t an exact doctrine, either. The court decides if the right to comment overrides the copyright on an individual basis in each case. There have been cases that go beyond the bounds of what I say above, but in general they don’t apply to the typical net misclaim of fair use. It’s a risky defense to attempt.
“If you don’t defend your copyright you lose it.”
False. Copyright is effectively never lost these days, unless explicitly given away. You may be thinking of trade marks, which can be weakened or lost if not defended.
“Somebody has that name copyrighted!”
You can’t “copyright a name,” or anything short like that. Titles usually don’t qualify- - but I doubt you may write a song entitled “Everybody’s got something to hide except for me and my monkey.” (J.lennon/P.MMcCartney).
You can’t copyright words, but you can trademark them, generally by using them to refer to your brand of a generic type of product or service. Like an “Apple” computer. Apple computer “owns” that word applied to computers, even though it is also an ordinary word. Apple Records owns it when applied to music. Neither owns the word on its own, only in context, and owning a mark doesn’t mean complete control- - see a more detailed treatise on this law for details.
You can’t use somebody else’s trademark in a way that would unfairly hurt the value of the mark, or in a way that might make people confuse you with the real owner of the mark, or which might allow you to profit from the mark’s god name. For example, if I were giving advice on music videos, I would be very wary of trying to label my works with a name like “mtv.” :-)
“They can’t get me, defendant in court have powerful rights!”
Copyright law is mostly civil law. If you violate copyright you would usually get sued, not charged with a crime. “Innocent until proven guilty” is a principle of criminal law, as is “proof beyond a reasonable doubt.” Sorry, but in copyright suits, these don’t apply the same way or at all.
It’s mostly which side and set of evidence the judge or jury accepts or believes more, though the rules vary based on the type of infringement. In civil cases you can even be made to testify against your own interests.
“Oh, so copyright violation isn’t a crime or anything?”
Actually, recently in the USA commercial copyright violation involving more than 10 copies and value over $2500 was made a felony. So watch out. (at least you get the protections of criminal law.) On the other hand, don’t think you’re going to get people thrown in jail for posting your E-mail. The courts have much better things to do than that. This is a fairly new, untested statute.
“It doesn’t hurt anybody- - in fact it’s free advertising.”
It’s up to the owner to decide if they want the free ads or not. If they want them, they will be sure to contact you. Don’t rationalize whether it hurts the owner or not, *ask* them. Usually that’s not too hard to do. Time past, ClariNet published the very funny Dave Barry column to a large and appreciative Usenet audience for a fee, but some person didn’t ask, and forwarded it to a mailing list, got caught, and the newspaper chain that employs Dave Barry pulled the column from the net, pissing off everybody who enjoyed it. Even if you can’t think of how the author or owner gets hurt, think about the fact that piracy on the net hurts everybody who wants a chance to use this wonderful new technology to do more than read other people’s flamewars.
“They e-mailed me a copy, so I can post it.”
To have a copy is not to have the copyright. All the E-mail you write is copyrighted. However, E-mail is not, unless previously agreed, secret. So you can certainly *report* on what E-mail you are sent, and reveal what it says. You can even quote parts of it to demonstrate. Frankly, somebody who sues over an ordinary message might well get no damages, because the message has no commercial value, but if you want to stay strictly in the law, you should ask first. On the other hand, don’t go nuts if somebody posts your E-mail. If it was an ordinary non-secret personal letter of minimal commercial value with no copyright notice (like 99.9% of all E-mail), you probably won’t get any damages if you sue them.
These days, almost all things are copyrighted the moment they are written, and no copyright notice is required.
Copyright is still violated whether you charged money or not, only damages are affected by that.
Postings to the net are not granted to the public domain, and don’t grant you any permission to do further copying except *perhaps* the sort of copying the poster might have expected in the ordinary flow of the net.
Fair use is a complex doctrine meant to allow certain valuable social purposes. Ask your self why you are republishing what you are posting and why you couldn’t have just rewritten it in you r own words.
Copyright is not lost because you don’t defend it; that’s a concept from trademark law. The ownership of names is also from trademark law, so don’t say somebody has a name copyrighted.
Copyright law is mostly civil law where the special rights of criminal defendants you hear so much about don’t apply. Watch out, however, as new laws are moving copyright violation into the criminal realm.
Don’t rationalize that you are helping the copyright holder; often it’s not that hard to ask permission.
Posting E-mail is technically a violation, but revealing facts from E-mail isn’t, and for almost all typical E-mail, nobody could wring any damages from you for posting it.
Permission is granted to freely copy this document in electronic form, or to print for personal use. If you had not seen a notice like this on the document, you would have to assume you did not have permission to copy it. This document is still protected by you-know-what even though it has no copyright notice.